Analysis of Gemini interconnect recovery mechanisms: methods and observations

Jha, Saurabh

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/95450 Copy

Description

Title

Analysis of Gemini interconnect recovery mechanisms: methods and observations

Author(s)

Jha, Saurabh

Issue Date

2016-08-16

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Iyer, Ravishankar K.

Department of Study

Computer Science

Discipline

Computer Science

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

M.S.

Degree Level

Thesis

Keyword(s)

• High Performance Computing
• Fault Tolerance
• Interconnects

Abstract

This thesis focuses on the resilience of network components, and recovery capabilities of extreme-scale high-performance computing (HPC) systems, specifically petaflop-level supercomputers, aimed at solving complex science, engineering, and business problems that require high bandwidth, enhanced networking, and high compute capabilities. The resilience of the network is critical for ensuring successful execution of the applications and overall system availability. Failure of interconnect components such as links, routers, power supply, etc. pose a threat to the resilience of the interconnect network, causing application failures and, in the worst case, system-wide failure. An extreme-scale system is designed to manage these failures and automatically recover from such failures to ensure successful application execution and avoid system-wide failure. Thus, in this thesis, we characterize the success probability of the recovery procedures as well as the impact of the recovery procedures on the applications. We developed an interconnect recovery mechanisms analysis tool (I-RAT), a plugin built on top of LogDiver to characterize and assess the impact of recovery mechanisms. The tool was used to analyze more than two years of network/system logs from Blue Waters, a supercomputer operated by the NCSA at the University of Illinois. Our analyses show that recovery mechanisms are frequently triggered (in as little as 36 hours for link failovers) that can fail with relatively high probability (as much as 0.25 for link failover). Furthermore, the analyses show that system resilience does not equate to application resilience since executing applications can fail with non-negligible probability during (or just after) a successful recovery. Our analyses show that interconnect recovery mechanisms are frequently triggered (the mean time between triggers is as short as 36 hours for link failovers), and the initiated recovery fails with relatively high probability (as much as 0.25 for link failover). We also show that as many as 20\% of the executing applications fail during the recovery phase.

Graduation Semester

2016-12

Type of Resource

text

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/95450

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2016 Saurabh Jha

Owning Collections