Maryland special education due process decisions: a closer look at the issues and outcomes

Puckett, Tiffany Sharnay

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/90909 Copy

Description

Title

Maryland special education due process decisions: a closer look at the issues and outcomes

Author(s)

Puckett, Tiffany Sharnay

Issue Date

2016-04-20

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Lubienski, Christopher

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Lubienski, Christopher

Committee Member(s)

• Shriner, James
• Pratt-Clarke, Menah
• Trent, William

Department of Study

Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp

Discipline

Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Keyword(s)

• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
• due process hearing
• special education disputes
• special education hearings
• Maryland
• special education complaints
• special education law
• special education litigation

Abstract

School districts are responsible for providing eligible students with disabilities with a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). Parents of eligible students with disabilities have three complaint mechanisms available when there are disputes with the school district regarding FAPE. One of those complaint mechanisms is the right to a due process hearing. Parents have utilized special education due process hearings over the past three decades; however they have not been that successful. This dissertation investigates how Maryland parents are using the system of due process hearings to participate in the education of their students with disabilities and to obtain desired relief from impartial hearing officers. The purpose of this study is to investigate parents' participation in due process hearings system in Maryland in order to identify the strengths and weaknesses with the system. Furthermore, the purpose is to determine if this system favors one group of parents over others. The study found that the most common issues within the hearings were related to Placement and the IEP. The most common remedies for prevailing parents were tuition reimbursement and private placement. Additionally, the study found that the school district prevailed in the majority of Maryland due process hearings. The parents that did prevail were represented by attorneys at their due process hearings. Additionally, the study found that there is a relationship between the parent's ability to have a successful outcome and the amount of capital a parent possessed. The author presents recommendations for action and areas for future research.

Graduation Semester

2016-05

Type of Resource

text

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90909

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2016 Tiffany Sharnay Puckett

Owning Collections