Eidos and Facticity in Husserl's Phenomenology of Judgment
Dickens, William Allen, Jr
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/87614
Description
Title
Eidos and Facticity in Husserl's Phenomenology of Judgment
Author(s)
Dickens, William Allen, Jr
Issue Date
2000
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Melnick, Arthur
Department of Study
Philosophy
Discipline
Philosophy
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Philosophy
Language
eng
Abstract
"The study concludes that Husserl's attempt, as well as Heidegger's, falls short. Husserl's fails because in both his ""static"" and ""genetic"" analyses of judgment he is compelled to cite an irremediably factical element as a transcendental explanatory factor, ""pure matter"" in the former case and the ""absolute now"" in the latter. Heidegger's account fails insofar as: (1) he accounts for the satisfaction of objectively warranted judgment's general necessary conditions in Dasein's Being in what amount to a priori, eidetic terms; and (2) he makes a necessary condition an irremediably non-eidetic factor, namely Dasein's pre-understanding of Being's general meaning. Despite their outward differences, then, both Husserl's and Heidegger's phenomenologies in their analyses of judgment fail for the ways in which eidos and facticity become related to one another."
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
