This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/87586
Description
Title
Nietzsche as Philosopher of Religion
Author(s)
Thompson, Joseph Closter
Issue Date
2002
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Richard Schacht
Department of Study
Philosophy
Discipline
Philosophy
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Religion, Philosophy of
Language
eng
Abstract
"Against the usual view that Nietzsche is antireligious, I argue for his positive philosophy of religion, and for an affirmative religiousness of his own which finds expression in the figures of Dionysus and Zarathustra. Nietzsche's critique of Christianity must not be taken for hostility toward religion in general: he insists upon its uses as well as disadvantages, in the ""service"" and ""enhancement"" of life. In all of Nietzsche's work I show how he refigures and rehabilitates conceptions of spirituality, transfiguration, redemption, even ""the divine"" and ""deification."" The opposition ""Dionysus versus the Crucified"" proves the key to Nietzsche's thought on religion: against a Christian-otherworldly, transcendence-oriented 'solution' to the problem of suffering (of 'evil'), Nietzsche poses the ""post-transcendence"" religion of Dionysus. Immune to the disillusionment and nihilistic rebound Nietzsche fears is inevitable once the otherworldly 'solution' is seen to be untenable---after the ""death of God""---Dionysus comes to symbolize a this-worldly religious orientation and sensibility associated with life affirmation, the ""justification"" of life through art, and the redemption of suffering. I call it a kind of ""art-religion,"" tracing its development from The Birth of Tragedy to the last line of Ecce Homo. Interpreting Zarathustra in these terms, I urge a reprioritization of this one book Nietzsche thought was his most important, as a major contribution to religion (and not just to philosophy or literature). Arguing for a more straightforwardly religious reading, I show that the work is not (as many have claimed) merely a parody of religion and religious figures. The prophet Zarathustra heralds the new religion of Dionysus: in this book, and in Nietzsche's work as a whole, I discern a kind of ""prelude to a religion of the future."""
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
