Simplifying Science: Scientific Uncertainty in News Coverage of Cancer Research
Jensen, Jakob Daniel
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/87536
Description
Title
Simplifying Science: Scientific Uncertainty in News Coverage of Cancer Research
Author(s)
Jensen, Jakob Daniel
Issue Date
2007
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Tewksbury, David H.
Department of Study
Speech Communication
Discipline
Speech Communication
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Mass Communications
Language
eng
Abstract
News coverage of scientific research is routinely streamlined. In other words, the research is stripped of caveats, limitations, and other indicators of scientific uncertainty. But whether streamlining affects audience perception is unknown. It has been suggested that streamlining may (a) influence news consumers' perceptions of scientists' and journalists' credibility (perceptions which may be related to support for scientific research and adoption of science-based recommendations) and/or (b) aid audience understanding of complex scientific information. To test these assumptions, a multiple-message experiment (N = 910) was conducted wherein college undergraduates were exposed to one of five manipulated news articles focused on cancer research. The articles were all manipulated to have varying levels (no uncertainty, low uncertainty, high uncertainty) and sources of scientific uncertainty (attributed to either scientists responsible for the research or to scientists unaffiliated with the research). The study found that both scientists and journalists were viewed as more trustworthy when scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research was increased and attributed to the scientists responsible for the research (as opposed to scientists unaffiliated with the research). Generally speaking, learning was not affected by the manipulations; although there was a marginally significant interaction between level of uncertainty and participant cancer anxiety. When news articles contained uncertainty, participants with low cancer anxiety were able to answer more questions correctly whereas participants with high cancer anxiety answered fewer questions correctly. The results provide researchers with valuable information about the role of scientific uncertainty in lay processing of science news as well as practical guidance to both scientists and journalists interested in the effective communication of science.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
