They Don't Think Like We Do: Factors Influencing Employees' Interpretations of Organizational Mission
Whitbred, Robert Charles
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/87517
Description
Title
They Don't Think Like We Do: Factors Influencing Employees' Interpretations of Organizational Mission
Author(s)
Whitbred, Robert Charles
Issue Date
2004
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Noshir Contractor
Department of Study
Speech Communication
Discipline
Speech Communication
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Business Administration, Management
Language
eng
Abstract
Organizational mission is the purpose, strategy, values, and behavioral standards of an organization that may or may not be articulated in a formal statement. The influence of mission on employees who are not strategic managers has been largely neglected. Organizational members develop their own interpretations of mission that are critical to their ability to function effectively in organizations. These interpretations influence what employees perceive as appropriate behavior, and eventually impact overall organizational functioning. This study begins to assess the relationship between mission and organizational members by focusing on four issues. First, it explores whether employees develop multiple interpretations of their organization's mission and if there is variability in these interpretations. Second, it investigates whether there is a relationship between an organization's formal mission statement and employees' interpretations of their organization's mission. Third, it tests hypotheses predicting which employees will be more likely to develop interpretations of mission that overlap with the organization's mission statement. Fourth, this study examines the relative influence of theoretical mechanisms on the likelihood of employees having similar interpretations of their organization's mission. Theories grounded in informal mechanisms (e.g., communication with one another), formal organizational factors (e.g., functional work group), and demographic factors (e.g., gender) were tested in three types of organizations (a bureaucracy, a platform organization, and a virtual organization). Semantic network analysis was used to facilitate this investigation. Results suggest employees develop multiple and variable interpretations of their organization's mission, there is an association between formal mission statements and employees' interpretations of mission, and employees who are high in the organizational hierarchy are more likely to have interpretations of the organization's mission that overlap with the mission statement. Further, employees in the bureaucracy who communicated with each other, who were in the same functional work group, and who were spatially proximate to one another were more likely to have similar interpretations of their organization's mission. In the platform organization, employees who were spatially proximate to one another were more likely to have similar interpretations of their organization's mission. Limitations of the study are recognized and avenues for future research are developed.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
