"Studies in Sallust's Historical Selectivity in the ""Bellum Iugurthinum"""
Weaire, Gavin Allen
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/87466
Description
Title
"Studies in Sallust's Historical Selectivity in the ""Bellum Iugurthinum"""
Author(s)
Weaire, Gavin Allen
Issue Date
2000
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Newman, J.K.
Department of Study
Classical Philology
Discipline
Classical Philology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
History, Ancient
Language
eng
Abstract
Perhaps the greatest cliche of writing on historiography is that historians exercise selectivity in choosing the events to incorporate into their narratives. But it is rare for a work on an ancient historian to take that as its central concern. Sallust's famous concentration and notorious omissions make him an appropriate subject for such an exercise, and my dissertation is an attempt to develop an understanding of his historical selectivity, and the concept of historical significance that informs it, as it operates in one particular work: the Bellum lugurtlainum. The aim is not only to identify a model of Sallust's selectivity that can account for problematic features of the text, but to ground that model in his intellectual context. I draw especially on Dionysius of Halicarnassus' criticism of Sallust's model Thucydides. I explore the possible points of contact between Dionysius and Sallust, and apply Dionysius' perception of Thucydides' aims to the question of what might give a particular event a claim to inclusion by Sallust, with an eye both on relevant modern arguments about the Bellum lugurthinum and the broad context of ancient historiographical theory. This produces a model of historical significance for me to test against, and develop further on the basis of, the specific indications that the Bellum Iugurthinum gives as to the importance of the events it contains. Next, I show how the results can be used to inform our reading of specific instances of selectivity found in the Bellum lugurthinum. I focus especially on the question of definable factual omissions, examining a number of the most well-known and baffling omissions of the work, such as the death of Jugurtha. Finally, I indicate how the approach might be of interest to the ancient historian as well as the student of ancient historiography, by applying it to a particular historical problem, the role of Scaurus in the quaestio Mamilia.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
