Grassy Knoll-Edges: Conspiracy Theories and Political Rationality in the 1990s
Bratich, Jack Zeljko
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/86555
Description
Title
Grassy Knoll-Edges: Conspiracy Theories and Political Rationality in the 1990s
Author(s)
Bratich, Jack Zeljko
Issue Date
2001
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Treichler, Paula A.
Department of Study
Communications
Discipline
Communications
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Political Science, General
Language
eng
Abstract
"This dissertation studies the recent proliferation of conspiracy theories in the United States and the attending ways official analyses have assessed them as a political problem. First, I examine the common representations of conspiracy theories by prominent cultural texts and institutions. Mainstream journalism (major newspapers, weekly magazines, and television broadcast news programs), alternative press organs (especially Left and liberal news magazines), and popular cultural media (television dramas and talk shows, Hollywood films, and best-selling books) are investigated for their similarities and differences with regards to representing conspiracy theories. Second, I analyze the conspiracy theories on their own terms. In doing so, I concentrate on how they take themselves as objects of concern, and I locate the points of intersection and conflict with the mainstream institutions that objectify them. I also examine how emerging technologies (especially the Internet) contribute to the dissemination of conspiracy theories, as well as to the concern about these theories by official institutions. Specifically, I focus on how the commonsensical representations of ""conspiracy theories"" are bound up with present day issues of political dissent and consent. What are the parameters of acceptable dissent in contemporary politics, and what new forms of consent are being forged? As reflections on citizenship, these representations of ""political paranoia"" continue the perpetual self-questioning of ""the American Character"" that composes American political history. I argue, then, that the recognition of conspiracy theories is also a recognition of our political possibilities and limitations in the contemporary American landscape."
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
