Counterfactual Thinking: An Underlying Mechanism of Post-Consumption Evaluation and Consumer Satisfaction
Kim, Junyong
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/84521
Description
Title
Counterfactual Thinking: An Underlying Mechanism of Post-Consumption Evaluation and Consumer Satisfaction
Author(s)
Kim, Junyong
Issue Date
2003
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Brian C. Wansink
Department of Study
Business Administration
Discipline
Business Administration
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Business Administration, Marketing
Language
eng
Abstract
While marketers strive to satisfy consumers with their products or services, factors outside their control such as malignant consumption environment or misuses by consumers thwart them occasionally. How can marketers minimize consumer dissatisfaction in such cases? Understanding consumers' post-consumption evaluation process is the key to answering this question. To this end, this dissertation proposes a framework of satisfaction determination where counterfactual thinking plays the central role in satisfaction determination. The framework suggests that consumers make counterfactual comparisons in different directions, depending on the situational salience of various comparison standards and their post-consumption evaluation goals. The differences in counterfactual comparisons lead to the differences in satisfaction given the same level of expectation disconfirmation. The results of the four studies in this dissertation indicate that marketers can influence consumers' post-consumption counterfactual thinking process and the resulting satisfaction by offering the right combinations of various marketing mix variables. Specifically, the results showed that, in general, a strict return policy led to greater dissatisfaction than a liberal return policy because it prompted more upward counterfactual comparisons. However, when consumers were endowed with high responsibility and freedom during their choice process and the focus of post-consumption evaluation was on their decisions, a strict return policy led to less dissatisfaction than a liberal return policy because consumers deliberately sought downward counterfactual comparisons to avoid negative feelings about their decisions.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
