Estimating Corn and Soybean Farm -Yield Distributions in Illinois
Zanini, Fabio De Camargo
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/82946
Description
Title
Estimating Corn and Soybean Farm -Yield Distributions in Illinois
Author(s)
Zanini, Fabio De Camargo
Issue Date
2001
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Irwin, Scott H.
Department of Study
Agricultural Economics
Discipline
Agricultural Economics
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Economics, Agricultural
Language
eng
Abstract
Considerable disagreement exists about the most appropriate characterization of farm-level yield distributions. This dissertation investigates corn- and soybean-yield distributions at the farm level, expanding the existing literature by providing results based on unique farm-level yield data and by suggesting methodological improvements in estimating crop-yield distributions. Before estimating the distribution of yields for a given time period, a linear trend model is identified as an adequate representation of crop yield trend at the farm level. The R-test and the Jarque-Bera test are then used to test for normality, using critical values that are obtained for the exact sizes of the yield samples. The results show that normality is rejected by a large number of fields. Based on likelihood measures, and Kohnogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling goodness-of-fit statistics, the logistic, Weibull and beta distributions consistently rank higher than the normal distribution. Goodness-of-fit results also suggest the danger of using a lognormal distribution to model farm-level yields. Finally, the results of this dissertation demonstrate that large differences in farmers' expected payments from Average Production History and Crop Revenue Coverage insurance policies can result solely from the parameterization chosen to represent yields. The results indicate that the typically unexamined premise of yield distribution may lead to incorrect conclusions in other important areas of insurance research, such as policy rating and quantitative assessment of expected losses from policies.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
