Egocentrism in Perceptions of Distributive Justice: When Favorable Outcomes Are Unfair Outcomes
Burrus, Jeremy T.
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/82106
Description
Title
Egocentrism in Perceptions of Distributive Justice: When Favorable Outcomes Are Unfair Outcomes
Author(s)
Burrus, Jeremy T.
Issue Date
2006
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Justin Kruger
Department of Study
Psychology
Discipline
Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Psychology, Industrial
Language
eng
Abstract
"Previous research has suggested that judgments of distributive justice are egoistic (e.g. Greenwald, 1983). That is, people tend to think that outcomes that favor themselves are fair outcomes. However, I propose that judgments of distributive justice are often a product of egocentrism (e.g. Kruger, 1999). That is, people tend to focus more on their own contribution than on the contribution of their collaborators when making distributive justice judgments. This leads to a prediction of an interaction of amount of contribution with favorability of outcome, such that people who have contributed a lot to a task will think it is fairer for them to receive more favorable outcomes than others than to receive less favorable outcomes than others. However, this effect should be attenuated, or even reversed, when participants have contributed little to the task. Importantly, this should be true even when their collaborators have contributed just as much or just as little as they have. In the primary study, two participants answered trivia questions as part of a ""quiz bowl team"", were paid money for their performance, and were asked to evaluate the distributive justice of the payments. Results supported the hypothesis. Thus, favorable outcomes may be seen as fair when contributions are high, but unfair when contributions are low."
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
