Beyond Nature and Nurture: The Influence of Implicit Gender Theories on Attitudes and Behavior
Coleman, Jill Marie
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/82078
Description
Title
Beyond Nature and Nurture: The Influence of Implicit Gender Theories on Attitudes and Behavior
Author(s)
Coleman, Jill Marie
Issue Date
2005
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Hong, Ying-Yi
Department of Study
Psychology
Discipline
Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Women's Studies
Language
eng
Abstract
Although the nature versus nurture debate has existed in psychological research for decades, there has not been much attention given to how individuals' ideas about this issue influence their beliefs. In the present research, we examined how peoples' beliefs that gender is biologically or socially constructed affected their attitudes toward women and their tendencies to describe themselves using stereotypically feminine traits. Based on previous work on implicit personality theories and psychological perspectives on gender, two implicit theories of gender (biological and social) were modeled and tested. It was hypothesized at the outset of the project that support for the biological theory would be associated with traditional attitudes toward women (Study 1), increased feminine self-stereotyping (Study 2), and an increased tendency to think and act in a manner consistent with feminine stereotypes (Study 3). The results of Study 1 showed that support for a biological theory of gender was associated with traditional, conservative attitudes toward women. The results of Study 2 demonstrated that the salience of a biological gender theory caused an increase in individuals' feminine self-stereotyping compared to the salience of the social theory, particularly when negative stereotypic traits were the subject of focus. The results of Study 3, however, failed to produce any significant effects of implicit gender theories on either stereotype-consistent decision making or responses to gender discrimination. Overall, the results of the three studies provided mixed support for the original predictions but do suggest that implicit gender theories have some influence on gender-related thoughts and behaviors.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.