An Individual Differences Approach to Emotion Regulation Using a Neuropsychological Model of Approach and Avoidance Temperament
Koven, Nancy S.
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/82055
Description
Title
An Individual Differences Approach to Emotion Regulation Using a Neuropsychological Model of Approach and Avoidance Temperament
Author(s)
Koven, Nancy S.
Issue Date
2004
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Heller, Wendy
Department of Study
Psychology
Discipline
Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Psychology, Clinical
Language
eng
Abstract
In this research, the relationships between approach and avoidance temperament, patterns of anterior brain asymmetry, situational strategies (suppression and cognitive reappraisal) to regulate negative emotion, and the outcomes of these strategies on emotion processes were examined. Two studies were conducted. Study 1 (N = 318) represents a replication of Elliot's and Thrash's (2002) finding that approach and avoidance temperament are latent personality variables that capture shared variance across the constructs of extraversion, positive temperament, and behavioral activation and the constructs of neuroticism, negative temperament, and behavioral inhibition, respectively. In Study 2 (N = 141), emotional responses of approach and avoidance temperament individuals to a situational stressor were measured in the experiential domain through self-report, in the behavioral domain through facial affective coding, and in the neuroendocrine domain through assessment of salivary cortisol levels. Results showed an interaction between temperament type and type of emotion regulation strategy such that approach temperament individuals used reappraisal advantageously to reduce degree of emotional reactivity. Avoidance temperament participants were more adept in using suppression to achieve the same results. Neuropsychological testing was also conducted in Study 2 to determine if temperament type was related to patterns of anterior brain asymmetry. Results indicated that approach-biased participants outperformed avoidance-biased participants on left frontal lobe tests (Tower of London, Verbal Fluency Test, Digit Span Test) and, conversely, that avoidance-biased participants excelled on right frontal lobe tests (Continuous Performance Test, Ruff Figural Fluency Test, Spatial Span Test). An analysis of brain asymmetry bias, as reflected in differences in neuropsychological profiles, and the effects of emotion regulation instructions on emotional outcomes yielded mixed results. Finally, it was found that patterns of neuropsychological asymmetry did not mediate the relationships between temperament and emotional outcome for either temperament group. The importance of examining temperament type and patterns of anterior brain asymmetry as individual difference variables in the study of emotion regulation effectiveness is discussed. Clinical and theoretical applications for these findings are also highlighted.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
