Ascribed and Acquired Identities: Women's Collective Renegotiation of Social and Personal Identity Following Brain Injury
Stewart, John Eric
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/82034
Description
Title
Ascribed and Acquired Identities: Women's Collective Renegotiation of Social and Personal Identity Following Brain Injury
Author(s)
Stewart, John Eric
Issue Date
2002
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Rappaport, Julian
Department of Study
Psychology
Discipline
Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Health Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapy
Language
eng
Abstract
"This study examines eleven women's accounts of recovery from and living with brain injury. It is a qualitative depth interview and semi-ethnographic study methodologically grounded in interpretive interactionism and narrative theory. The broad focus is on the ways and contexts in which these women negotiate the process of re-authoring identity and identifications following their injuries. Of specific interest is the role of narratives---personal, communal and ""metaphysical""---in locating, creating, modifying and/or rejecting forms and forums of identity and community. The narrative interest foregrounds questions about the interrelationships between identity (both pre- and post-injury identities), contexts and communities, and the intersections and dilemmas of narratives. How do the women come to narrative resolution of an opposition between self and disabled body and brain, between self and the cultural and local discourses and practices that define being brain injured, and between self and the challenges to meaning and sensibility that brain injury invokes? The study design was collaborative, multistaged and iterative. Analysis was thematic and primarily followed an interpretive biographical method, however narrative, epiphanic and critical theory approaches were also employed, with the aim of understanding the intersections of personal experience with social settings, practices, policies and discourses. Results are presented using lengthy excerpts from the women's own accounts and are organized around four major themes: (1) The culture of formal rehabilitation and how it does and does not facilitate understanding and living with disability; (2) coming to identify with a disability community and find a place within it; (3) spirituality and religion as means of negotiating meaning for the injury and chronic disability; and, (4) the importance of texts, films, and electronic communications for identifying and maintaining community. The concluding discussion emphasizes the centrality of heterogeneity in understanding brain injury recovery and in studying and creating resources and settings for recovery from and living with brain injury."
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
