Framing a Validity Argument for Test Use and Impact: The Malaysian Public Service Experience
Abdul Kadir, Kadeessa
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/80046
Description
Title
Framing a Validity Argument for Test Use and Impact: The Malaysian Public Service Experience
Author(s)
Abdul Kadir, Kadeessa
Issue Date
2008
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Davidson, Fred
Department of Study
Educational Psychology
Discipline
Educational Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Political Science, Public Administration
Language
eng
Abstract
Overall the interpretive argument framework for test validation as proposed by Kane worked well for the intended purpose of the study despite some drawbacks. These included the demands for comprehensiveness and the multitude of evidence needed in order to evaluate the strength of the validity argument for examining test use and impact and whether these demands can be met effectively by a single researcher in a single study.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
