Heidegger's authenticity

O'Connell, Derek Robert

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/78404 Copy

Description

Title

Heidegger's authenticity

Author(s)

O'Connell, Derek Robert

Issue Date

2015-04-17

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Melnick, Arthur

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Melnick, Arthur

Committee Member(s)

• Schacht, Richard
• Wengert, Robert G.
• Orlie, Melissa

Department of Study

Philosophy

Discipline

Philosophy

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Keyword(s)

• Heidegger
• Continental Philosophy
• History of Philosophy
• 20th Century Philosophy

Abstract

This dissertation is a study of Martin Heidegger’s understanding of the concept of authenticity, and how that understanding may have changed over time, via a careful investigation of Heidegger’s written works, from Being and Time in the 1920s to works of the mid-1960s. This study has two goals. Narrowly, it argues that the key elements of Heidegger’s account of authenticity do not change over the period under consideration—while the nature of his elaboration shifts dramatically, the key content stays the same. Broadly, since a fundamental change in the understanding of authenticity, especially how it relates to history and to human volition (referred to below as the active/passive dimension), is central in most interpretations that argue for a strong turn, or Kehre, in Heidegger’s later works, this study provides substantial evidence that there was not nearly as dramatic a shift in Heidegger’s views as many argue. Chapter 1 introduces the issue by discussing Heidegger’s understanding of authenticity in general, ways history and the active/passive dimension could relate to authenticity, the general outlines of strong interpretations in relation to these two issues, and what various interpreters who hold such interpretations argue. Chapters 2, 3, and 4 examine Heidegger’s views on authenticity, history, and the active/passive dimension, in roughly the 1920s, mid to late-1930s, and 1940s-1960s, respectively. Chapter 5 concludes, discussing in broad terms why strong interpretations of the Kehre are tempting even if misguided, and sketching a reading of the Kehre better suggested by the views argued for in this study.

Graduation Semester

2015-5

Type of Resource

text

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/78404

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2015 Derek O'Connell

Owning Collections