The Predominance of Race in American Mass Political Thinking: Racial Belief System Centrality and the Racialization of American Politics
Hurley, Norman Lamont
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/77475
Description
Title
The Predominance of Race in American Mass Political Thinking: Racial Belief System Centrality and the Racialization of American Politics
Author(s)
Hurley, Norman Lamont
Issue Date
1997
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Kuklinski, James H.
Department of Study
Political Science
Discipline
Political Science
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
American Studies
Psychology, Social
Political Science, General
Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies
Language
eng
Abstract
Political research has documented the role of race in the transformation of the American political system. In the mid-1960s, the electorate became, and has remained, polarized around the race issue. Scholars have also discovered that race provides a core structuring principle for a substantial portion of the public. In explaining this apparent centrality of race, they hypothesize that it has become an integral component of citizens' political belief systems and, thus, imply that it inevitably enters into political reasoning. Although compelling, this explanation for race's prevalence, the "centrality" hypothesis, largely overlooks the causal forces in the external political environment that foster, and thereby induce, racially based thinking. The central thesis of this research, the "racialization" thesis, provides an alternative explanation for the predominance of race in American politics. As race is extraordinarily divisive, and has proven its electoral might, many candidates have alluring incentives to exploit this issue for political gain. Through the skillful use of manipulative political language and other subtle--and sometimes not-so-subtle--means, they are able effectively to elicit racially driven mass political reasoning. A major implication here is that race need not pervade mass political thinking. The political psychology associated with racializing politics (categorization strategies, priming and attitude accessibility, stereotyping, affective and emotional reactions to political stimuli, and the automatic processing of information) is discussed in depth. An experimental methodology is employed to test the validity of both theses. As the findings are somewhat mixed, support is obtained for both theses.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
