Communication Technologies and Society: Causality and Intervention
Slack, Jennifer Daryl
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/77099
Description
Title
Communication Technologies and Society: Causality and Intervention
Author(s)
Slack, Jennifer Daryl
Issue Date
1981
Department of Study
Speech Communication
Discipline
Speech Communication
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Mass Communications
Language
eng
Abstract
This study critiques current notions of and perspectives on communication technologies in order to demonstrate that such are inadequate as bases for critical and comprehensive understanding of the relationship between communication technologies and society and as bases for effective strategies for technological intervention. Out of the desire to control technological growth and the effects--both beneficial and deleterious--of technologies, three approaches have assumed paramount importance: Technology Assessment, Alternative Technology, and Luddism. These three are examined in depth and their failings explained, in part, in terms of the concepts of causality embedded in their analyses and practice. In contrast to inadequate conceptions of causality--simple, symptomatic, and expressive--a theory of structural causality, as developed by the French philosopher Louis Althusser, is explicated. By utilizing a model of causality as structural it is possible to overcome the deficiencies of the previous models and form the basis for a critical and comprehensive inquiry into the relationship between communication technologies and society and subsequent strategies for intervention. By applying structural causality to a concrete instance--the relationship between patent law and the invention and innovation of communication technologies--this study demonstrates the explanatory power of a structural causal approach in analyzing the relationship between the social formation and communication technologies. On the basis of this analysis, the study concludes that the only effective strategy of intervention in the relationship between patent law and the invention and innovation of communication technologies is one that seeks as its goal the abolition of property rights in invention. The study concludes with a discussion of the consequences of using a conception of causality as structural for the concept of communications revolutions, and more specifically for the concept of the information revolution.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
