After MacIntyre: A Critical Assessment of the Historical Method of Value Inquiry
Johnson, Paul Franklin
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/72599
Description
Title
After MacIntyre: A Critical Assessment of the Historical Method of Value Inquiry
Author(s)
Johnson, Paul Franklin
Issue Date
1992
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Schacht, Richard L.
Department of Study
Philosophy
Discipline
Philosophy
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Philosophy
Political Science, General
Abstract
In his two books After Virtue (2nd edition; 1984) and Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (1988), Alasdair MacIntyre argues that contemporary political discourse has fallen into a fragmented and impoverished condition as a result of the fact that we have lost contact with the philosophical tradition which spawned our political and cultural practices, and sustained them for hundreds of years. He employs the methods of historical analysis and interpretation in order to disclose the source of what he perceives to be a dangerous and regrettable condition, and argues for the need to recover essential elements of the tradition of discourse in order to set things right. We are offered a choice between Aristotle and Nietzsche as the one philosopher who is best able to account for our current circumstance. He decides in favor of Aristotle, and proceeds to construct a theory of moral rationality, incorporating a critically reconstituted conception of a human telos, as the appropriate means for restoring order and coherence to our public policy debates. I find that the historical method as MacIntyre utilizes it is indeed an appropriate and effective means for coming to understand our present situation, but argue (1) that his own historical analysis is defective and (2) that he is himself more thoroughly indebted to Nietzsche's way of thinking than he can admit without seriously undermining his own position. I offer an alternative account of the philosophical tradition deriving from the eighteenth century, concentrating on the German Aufklarung and the works of Kant, Hegel and Marx with the intention of showing that Nietzsche stands within the mainstream of this tradition and offers us, contrary to MacIntyre, the more effective and respectable resources for understanding and managing the challenges that confront us today. A better appreciation of Nietzsche's writings, when set within the historical context I attempt to provide, also opens up the prospect for a more positive assessment of the contemporary political scene.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
