The Speed of the Market Response to Earnings Announcements and the Bid-Ask Spread: An Empirical Study
Noland, Thomas Rodney
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/72561
Description
Title
The Speed of the Market Response to Earnings Announcements and the Bid-Ask Spread: An Empirical Study
Author(s)
Noland, Thomas Rodney
Issue Date
1992
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Ziebart, David A.
Department of Study
Accountancy
Discipline
Accountancy
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Business Administration, Accounting
Economics, Finance
Abstract
It is hypothesized that cross-sectional differences in the speed of the market response to an earnings announcement are positively related to the precision of the information contained in the announcement. The bid-ask spread is used as a proxy for the precision of the information contained in the earnings announcement, since Glosten and Milgrom (1985) provides theoretical support for the use of the bid-ask spread as a proxy for precision.
Intervention analysis (Box and Tiao (1975)) is used in this study to estimate the speed of response. It provides several methodological advantages over methods used in previous studies. Capitalized equity value and average trading volume in the five-day trading period following the earnings announcement are included in the regression to improve experimental control.
The results of pooled absolute abnormal returns are consistent with the hypothesized relationship. The average returns for the firms in the quintile with the largest proportional bid-ask spreads appear to have the fastest decay pattern, while the average returns for the firms in the quintile with the smallest proportional bid-ask spreads appear to have the slowest decay pattern. However, the results do not represent a statistical test of the hypothesis.
Using individual-firm data, the null hypothesis can be rejected at a significance level of 10%, but the null hypothesis cannot be rejected at a significance level of 5%. The inconsistency between the results for the pooled data and the individual-firm data is most likely a reflection of the noisier return patterns found in the individual-firm data.
In an additional analysis, when the sign of the shift in the absolute returns series is ignored, the null hypothesis is not rejected, but a strong negative correlation between firm size and the speed of the market's response is observed.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.