Strategies for Commercialization: Missouri Agriculture, 1860-1880
Gregson, Mary Eschelbach
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/72421
Description
Title
Strategies for Commercialization: Missouri Agriculture, 1860-1880
Author(s)
Gregson, Mary Eschelbach
Issue Date
1993
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Atack, Jeremy
Department of Study
Economics
Discipline
Economics
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
History, United States
Economics, General
Economics, History
Abstract
The conventional wisdom that commercialization fostered specialization, in the aggregate and on the farm, is not confirmed by farm-level evidence. I create a linked sample of rural farms and households from the 1860, 1870 and 1880 population and agricultural censuses of Missouri, and add data from local property tax records in order to document and model farmers' production strategies for commercialization. The story of agricultural change in Missouri during the post-Civil War period is not one of commercialization creating opportunities for farmers to specialize. Instead, it is the story of commercialization fostering diversification.
I develop a model of endowment-contingent crop choice that explains why Missouri farmers chose to diversify as marketing costs fell and commercialization progressed. The decline in marketing costs during the late nineteenth century, other things equal, meant that soil suitability became a more important determinant of the most profitable use of land. In areas with heterogeneous soil and topology such as my Missouri sample, the model predicts that farmers would diversify as they commercialize. Moreover, my model reconciles the farm-level evidence with the macro story of comparative advantage and provides a testable hypothesis for explaining the pattern of agricultural development in other places and at other times.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.