The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk: Some Implications for Hedonic Damages
Bruehler, James Raymond
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/72420
Description
Title
The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk: Some Implications for Hedonic Damages
Author(s)
Bruehler, James Raymond
Issue Date
1993
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Ulen, Thomas S.
Department of Study
Economics
Discipline
Economics
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Law
Economics, General
Abstract
The economic theory of tort has been dominated by an ex post perspective. Researchers have tended to think about the ways in which accident costs could be allocated among parties to provide each with incentives to undertake efficient levels of precaution. In this thesis, it is argued that the focus on accident costs is not generally proper. It happens to be appropriate in a special case when the cost of bearing risk equals the value of a potential accident times the probability of incurring the loss. More generally, it is the value of risk bearing, not the value of losses, that is pertinent to choices over the allocation of resources. Once this is recognized, it becomes clear that the hedonic value-of-life should not be interpreted as a measure of ex post accident costs. Rather, the hedonic value-of-life is an attempt to calculate a remedy that will cause the potential tort-feasor to associate with behaviors that engender risk costs that reflect the amount that fully informed potential victims would require in order to willingly bear those risks. The scope of the analysis is restricted to situations characterized by unilateral damages and unilateral precautionary technology. The theory developed suggests that the remedy that is perfectly efficient with respect to deterrence will vary with the magnitude of the risk increment created by the tort-feasor's activities. Because, as currently practiced, the hedonic value-of-life does not specifically depend upon the magnitude of the risk created by the tort-feasor and because it may be too costly to cause it to do so, the magnitude of the error arising from using a single hedonic value-of-life over a range of probability increments is estimated. Using simulations constructed from a Friedman-Savage type state-dependent utility of wealth framework and given moderate assumptions, it is estimated that the error arising specifically from this source is likely to be acceptable for the cases that would be adjudicated under tort rather than criminal law.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
