A Defense of Arithmetical Platonism (Variations on a Theme by Kitcher)
Norton-Smith, Thomas Michael
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/71566
Description
Title
A Defense of Arithmetical Platonism (Variations on a Theme by Kitcher)
Author(s)
Norton-Smith, Thomas Michael
Issue Date
1988
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Wagner, Steven J.
Department of Study
Philosophy
Discipline
Philosophy
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Mathematics
Philosophy
Abstract
In The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge (1984) Philip Kitcher develops an exciting and insightful picture of arithmetical reality by considering mathematical activities--not objects--as ontologically primitive. Yet, his account goes astray because of his nominalistic interpretation of the properties of human activity, resulting in an implausible modal view of the truth of arithmetical statements.
After critiquing Kitcher's conceptions of arithmetical truth and knowledge--and finding them deficient--I develop an interpretation of standard first-order number theory which finds the referents of numerical expressions to be platonistically construed properties of human collecting activity. I proceed by specifying three "meta-arithmetical" criteria which, when conjoined with Kitcher's assumption of the ontological primacy of human operations, serve to delimit the range of possible candidates for a plausible interpretation of number theory.
I require the referents of arithmetical expressions to be (1) abstract objects, (2) epistemically accessible in an appropriately causal way, and (3) fixed in part by the way that numerical expressions are used. Clearly, reconciling the first two criteria is tantamount to answering Benacerraf's (1973) challenge to platonism: provide a naturalistically acceptable account of mathematical knowledge. Further, I argue that a causal account of reference which parallels the Kripke/Putnam view for natural kinds arises naturally from my account, buttressing its plausibility.
That we have arithmetical knowledge is obvious. The more interesting question is whether or not it is posssible that any of our mathematical knowledge can be a priori. Providing an affirmative answer to this query closes this defense of arithmetical platonism.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
