This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/71074
Description
Title
Towards an Ecological Model of Prehension
Author(s)
Rutter, Bryce George
Issue Date
1987
Department of Study
Kinesiology
Discipline
Kinesiology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Psychology, Developmental
Health Sciences, Human Development
Abstract
This dissertation presents an ecological model of human prehensile behavior utilizing the technique of dimensional analysis to develop pi-numbers that express body scaled relationships between hands and objects of prehension. Hand patterns were classified relative to generic action categories of immobilization, displacement, projection, and manipulation. These generic action categories do not embody all prehensile patterns but, do indeed capture a majority, as well as patterns of specific interest in the design of products that interface with hands. The present study presents evidence that prehensile behavior is body scaled and that subjects can accurately predict a priori, without visual or tactile feedback, grip architecture and grip capacity, as a function of generic action category. For each generic action category critical points are provided for shifts from bilateral to multilateral grip architectures, and boundary points for one-handed graspability. Critical point values decrease as a function of action category, when ordered as above, which is seen as an indicant of task difficulty. Finger use frequencies were used to define subcategories unilateral, bilateral, and multilateral, on the basis of finger to object contacts and opposition planes present in a grip. The traditional interpretation of the hand possessing 14 links affording 21 degrees of freedom is reassessed and an alternative is proposed based on fingertip to object contacts in which control and coordination in the hand can be simplified to 5 links affording 10 degrees of freedom. Experimental results are marshalled to support an ecological model for prehensile behavior in which there is the global action category of grasping, and four categories of generic grasping action within which grip architectures are classed relative to the number of opposition planes and fingertip to object contacts, for dominant and nondominant hands. As a summary, the benefits and application of body scaling in design is discussed and compared to the utility of current ergonomic data.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
