Dispute Negotiations Among the Guajiro of Colombia and Venezuela: Dynamics of Compensation and Status
Mansen, Richard Arnold
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/70703
Description
Title
Dispute Negotiations Among the Guajiro of Colombia and Venezuela: Dynamics of Compensation and Status
Author(s)
Mansen, Richard Arnold
Issue Date
1988
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Keller, Janet
Department of Study
Anthropology
Discipline
Anthropology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Anthropology, Cultural
Law
Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations
Abstract
Process approaches to the anthropology of law have selected the dispute settlement process as a prime research target. Adequately handling the mass of data while admitting its incompleteness remain nagging weaknesses encountered with case studies of real-life disputes, particularly across cultures
By a micro approach, this work analyzes in depth by case study the dispute negotiation process among the Guajiro, a semi-nomadic, acephalous, egalitarian pastoral people of northern South America. A Guajiro appointed by the offended party as go-between seeks without authority but by persuasion to reach a joint decision with the offender party on compensation payment.
A negotiation model is applied to a lengthy verbatim vernacular recording of Guajiro dispute negotiations (text with interlinear translation in the appendix) in order to describe the dynamics of both explicit compensation decisions and implicit status (prestige) generation. General negotiator objectives are operationalized in terms of "tasks". Those dealing more with compensation were based on Gulliver's interaction model and those dealing more with status were derived by the author. This adaptation of Gulliver's negotiation models to incorporate the goal of status provided a greatly improved investigatory and explanatory instrument. It required, however, interpretive decisions by the author based on many years of living with the Guajiro, fluency in speaking the language, and extensive linguistic and ethnographic investigation.
It was discovered that the two disputing parties gain equal status and that the mediator gains more that either of them. Also, the dynamics of compensation negotiation are not permitted to reach prominence until after the dynamics of status generation have reached prominence, thus skewing the fit of Gulliver's model to Guajiro.
The in-depth micro-approach vernacular case study and the analysis of issues, outside influence, norms and power in negotiations contributes to process approaches in the ethnology of law. The revelation of a go-between-as-mediator law process from lowland South America contributes to a field dominated by African and Middle-Eastern studies. And the innovative incorporation of status into the negotiation model strikingly amplifies investigative potential, not only for the Guajiro, but for negotiations in any culture dealing with any issues.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
