Influence of Physical and Olfactory Environment on Swine Aggression
Mcglone, John James
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/69989
Description
Title
Influence of Physical and Olfactory Environment on Swine Aggression
Author(s)
Mcglone, John James
Issue Date
1981
Department of Study
Animal Sciences
Discipline
Animal Sciences
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Agriculture, Animal Culture and Nutrition
Abstract
One thousand and six young crossbred pigs were used in a series of applied ethological studies and one physiological study. The objective of these studies were to identify sources of variation in swine aggressive behavior and to better understand mechanisms which modulate fighting. The social dynamics within groups of four pigs were quantified. Duration of attack was not significantly different than zero by two to four hours after regrouping three replicates. One replicate required 26 hours to reach minimal aggression. Use of the feeder and some resting areas, duration of attack and body weight were not highly correlated. The data indicate that individual pigs show differential use of resources; however, a pig which dominates one resource does not necessarily dominate another. The second study provided pigs areas to "hide" their head and shoulders. Provision of these "hides" resulted in 40 per cent less fighting and fewer wounds. Hide pens or regrouping did not affect pig gain or feed efficiency during a 21-day trial. The third study suggested pigs give off odors which alter fighting among experimentally naive pigs. Urine from fighting pigs, when coated on the skin of other pigs, reduced fighting of the other pigs. Pigs not fighting, moved to another pen, had urine properties which increased fighting among test pigs. This differential effect, observed using aggressive and unaggressive urine from barrows and gilts, was not observed from similar samples obtained from boars. The suggested reproductive pheromone, 5(alpha)-androst-16-en-3-one, reduced the duration of fighting by 85 per cent while in another experiment, testosterone did not influence pig aggression. Testosterone did reduce the increase in fighting induced by corticosterone application. These results suggest an androgen reduced fighting and a glucocorticoid increased fighting. In the final study, preliminary neurophysiological data indicated that 5(alpha)-androst-16-en-3-one increased electical activity of the olfactory bulb in the freely-moving conscious young pig. The results suggest strong olfactory modulation of swine aggression.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
