University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Predicting Goal Choice and Goal Commitment Within a Control Systems Framework

McLaughlin, Mary Elizabeth

This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/69718

Description

Title
Predicting Goal Choice and Goal Commitment Within a Control Systems Framework
Author(s)
McLaughlin, Mary Elizabeth
Issue Date
1988
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Hulin, Charles
Department of Study
Psychology
Discipline
Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Psychology, Experimental
Abstract
  • Two laboratory studies were conducted to test specific links in a control systems model of goal choice and goal commitment. Male and female subjects performed five trials on either a paper and pencil text editing task (Study 1) or a text transfer task on a microcomputer (Study 2). The results demonstrated that both performance expectations and previous task performance influenced choice of goal difficulty for subsequent trials. The importance of performance expectations relative to previous trial performance for predicting goal choice diminished as subjects gained experience with the task. The value of goal achievement had minimal influence on goal choice. However, the value of goal achievement was highly and positively related to commitment to achieving goals; performance expectations were not related significantly to commitment.
  • In addition to testing the general model of goal choice and goal commitment, three specific expectancy-value models were tested for predicting goal choice. The three models that were tested were subjective expected utility (SEU) theory, Vroom's valence-instrumentality-expectancy (VIE) theory, and Naylor, Pritchard, and Ilgen's (NPI) theory. The proportion of subjects whose goals matched the goal levels that were predicted by the models was determined for each of the models, for each trial. None of the three models classified correctly more than 34% of one-half of the standard deviation of goals. The SEU model was consistently the best predictor of subjects' goals. The NPI model consistently over-predicted subjects' goals. Explanations for the lack of success of the models for predicting goal choice are offered.
Graduation Semester
1988
Type of Resource
text
Permalink
http://hdl.handle.net/2142/69718

Owning Collections

Graduate Dissertations and Theses at Illinois PRIMARY
Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois
Dissertations and Theses - Psychology
Dissertations and Theses from the Dept. of Psychology