An Investigation and Selective Assessment of Secondary School Reading Programs in Illinois
Dixon, Karen Marcavage
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/65985
Description
Title
An Investigation and Selective Assessment of Secondary School Reading Programs in Illinois
Author(s)
Dixon, Karen Marcavage
Issue Date
1980
Department of Study
Education
Discipline
Education
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Education, Reading
Language
eng
Abstract
In recent years, the well-publicized decline in standardized test scores and cases such as Peter Doe vs. the San Francisco Unified School District (Harper and Killarr, 1977) have spawned an outburst of public criticism directed at the public schools. Reading instruction and students' reading abilities are at the center of the controversy. But a question crucial to understanding the situation and correcting it if necessary has been ignored: What is the nature of the reading programs currently operating in the secondary schools, and how widely available is organized instruction at the secondary level? Hill (1971) noted "we know very little more about secondary school reading instruction and program operations in 1970 than we did one or two decades ago..." (p.28). Hill goes on to stress the need for detailed surveys and carefully reported results.
In Illinois, no thorough investigation of secondary school reading programs had been conducted since 1960. The present investigation was designed to determine the availability of reading instruction in secondary schools, to assess what proportion of the current programs might be considered good programs based on profession recommendation, to identify characteristics common to apparently successful programs, to discover needs in the areas of teacher training and program planning, and to determine the feasability of conducting a national study of secondary school reading programs.
A detailed questionnaire was sent to 1,100 middle, junior high, and senior high schools in Illinois. Responses from just under half of the schools indicated that reading instruction in some form was available in 78% of the schools. While this indicated some progress in terms of numbers of programs, remedial instruction was found to be offered most frequently, and there was some indication that nearly half of the students enrolled in reading classes were enrolled in classes designed to correct reading problems rather than to develop and refine reading skills. Advances in teacher training were revealed, but there still appears to be a shortage of qualified teachers in many areas. The most important finding in terms of the characterization of programs was the extremely small proportion of programs meeting the criteria of effective programs. Using a strict set of seven criteria, only 4.5% of the programs reported were considered exemplars of good programs; approximately 26% of the programs met three minimally accepted standards of quality. Nearly one-third of the reported programs were judged to have the potential to improve their quality.
Several suggestions are offered for improving program planning and teacher education, including increased articulation between secondary school reading educators and their colleagues in elementary schools; more systematic evaluation of the reading program; and the pooling of resources of small schools through consolidation in order to increase the likelihood of providing a program that meets the needs of all students.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.