This paper briefly summarizes the history of evaluation in information
retrieval and describes both the strengths and limitations of traditional
criteria for retrieval effectiveness such as precision, recall, cost, novelty,
and satisfaction. It presents a continuum of approaches to studying
the user in information retrieval, and suggests that because the situations
in which information is sought and used are social situations, objective
measures such as retrieval sets and transaction log data may have limited
usefulness in determining retrieval effectiveness. Information retrieval
evaluation has been locked into a rationalistic, empirical framework
which is no longer adequate.
A different framework of analysis, design, and evaluation that is
contextual in nature is needed. User-centered criteria employing affective
measures such as user satisfaction and situational information retrieval
must be incorporated into evaluation and design of new information
retrieval systems. Qualitative methods such as case studies, focus groups,
or in-depth interviews can be combined with objective measures to
produce more effective information retrieval research and evaluation.
Publisher
Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.