Towns undergoing changes: a case study on the recovery after the Wenchuan earthquake, China

Jiang, Wenjing

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/50640 Copy

Description

Title

Towns undergoing changes: a case study on the recovery after the Wenchuan earthquake, China

Author(s)

Jiang, Wenjing

Issue Date

2014-09-16

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Olshansky, Robert B.

Department of Study

Urban & Regional Planning

Discipline

Urban Planning

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

M.U.P.

Degree Level

Thesis

Keyword(s)

• post-disaster recovery planning
• Wenchuan Earthquake
• Shuimo

Abstract

Post-disaster recovery is a complicated and dynamic socio-economic-political process, with time compression as the key feature that differentiates it from normal development procedures. The devastating Wenchuan Earthquake in China occurred on May 12, 2008, and its recovery process provides a unique case for post-disaster recovery research with its rapid reconstruction under a government-led top-down process, in particular a national counterpart assistance program. How did they recover so quickly? What were the accomplishments and risks under the tight time constraints? What decisions were made locally and by whom? And what were the key factors influencing speed and deliberation during the whole process? This thesis conducts a case study of Shuimo in Wenchuan County to address these questions. Based on a multi-disciplinary approach, this research has identified achievements in physical recovery, economic recovery, environmental improvement, and landscape enhancement. However, the top-down political system entitled the assistance groups as outsiders more power than local residents and officials in the decision making process, creating some potential costs to the disaster affected area, including a lack of consideration to the details of physical recovery, previous lifestyles, normal educational activities, and the local value systems. In addition, the recovery caused potential regional inequities, which should draw the attention of policy makers. Despite all these uncertainties and questions unanswered, there are several lessons we can learn from this case: (1) The counterpart assistance system can address the needs of both speed and quality and it can allow both knowledge sharing and innovations in post-disaster recovery, but policy makers should adjust the design of such programs in the future according to the situation at hand; (2) Post-disaster recovery planning can be powerful in financing reconstruction projects, yet a powerful planning process might lead to potential social costs for localities, calling for careful use of it; (3) Planners should use their power to attract external resources, be innovative to balance speed and deliberation, and address the mismatch between local needs and outsiders’ visions during the recovery planning process.

Graduation Semester

2014-08

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/50640

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2014 Wenjing Jiang

Owning Collections