Withdraw
Loading…
Effects of close-up dietary energy strategy and prepartal dietary monensin on production and metabolism in Holstein cows
Vasquez, Joel
Loading…
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/42237
Description
- Title
- Effects of close-up dietary energy strategy and prepartal dietary monensin on production and metabolism in Holstein cows
- Author(s)
- Vasquez, Joel
- Issue Date
- 2013-02-03T19:28:50Z
- Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
- Drackley, James K.
- Department of Study
- Animal Sciences
- Discipline
- Animal Sciences
- Degree Granting Institution
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Degree Name
- M.S.
- Degree Level
- Thesis
- Date of Ingest
- 2013-02-03T19:28:50Z
- Keyword(s)
- monensin
- prepartum dietary energy
- metabolism
- Abstract
- The objective of this study was to evaluate the inclusion of 22 g/ton of monensin (M) in a single group diet (controlled energy-high fiber, CE) and a two-group diet (CE during the far-off and a high energy diet during close-up, CU) during the dry period (DP) on production and metabolism in the first 84 days postpartum. The CE diet was formulated for a dietary energy concentration of 1.30 Mcal NEL /kg DM and the CU diet for 1.49 Mcal NEL /kg DM. A total of 102 cows (70 multiparous and 32 primiparous) were assigned randomly to 1 of the 4 treatments in a 2 (CE or CE/CU DP feeding strategy) × 2 (inclusion of 0 or 22 g/ton of M) factorial arrangement. After calving, all cows received a lactation diet formulated for a dietary energy concentration of 1.70 Mcal NEL /kg DM and 14 g/ton of M. Liver samples were obtained of a subset of mature cows at -10 and 7 d relative to calving. Dry matter intake (DMI) was not affected by the inclusion of M or diet fed during the far-off period, but was 1.7 kg greater during the close-up period for cows that were fed the CU diet than cows fed CE (P < 0.001). None of the treatments affected DMI, body weight, or body condition score during the 84 d of lactation. Neither of the feeding strategies affected milk yield, milk component yields, percentage of milk protein, or fat-corrected milk except that percentage of milk fat was higher for CU than for CE (P = 0.03). The inclusion of M increased lactose content (P < 0.01) and yields of lactose (P = 0.03), fat (P = 0.01), total solids (P = 0.03), and FCM (P = 0.01), and tended to increase milk yield (P = 0.06). Fat, protein, and total solids contents were not affected by the inclusion of M. Cows that were fed CE had greater NEFA concentrations prepartum (P < 0.01) but lower NEFA postpartum (P = 0.05). The inclusion of M during the DP did not affect prepartum or postpartum NEFA and BHBA concentrations. Concentrations of total lipid, triglyceride, and glycogen in liver of mature cows were not affected by treatments. . Feeding a diet of higher dietary energy density for 21 d before calving did not benefit production or metabolism. The CU treatment increased milk fat content, but it was probably due to the higher NEFA concentration. The inclusion of M in the DP increased yields of milk fat, lactose, total solids, and FCM.
- Graduation Semester
- 2012-12
- Permalink
- http://hdl.handle.net/2142/42237
- Copyright and License Information
- Copyright 2012 Joel Vasquez
Owning Collections
Graduate Dissertations and Theses at Illinois PRIMARY
Graduate Theses and Dissertations at IllinoisManage Files
Loading…
Edit Collection Membership
Loading…
Edit Metadata
Loading…
Edit Properties
Loading…
Embargoes
Loading…