Using machine learning models to interpret disciplinary styles of metadiscourse in dissertation abstracts
Demarest, Bradford; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.
Loading…
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/42038
Description
Title
Using machine learning models to interpret disciplinary styles of metadiscourse in dissertation abstracts
Author(s)
Demarest, Bradford
Sugimoto, Cassidy R.
Issue Date
2013-02
Keyword(s)
metadiscourse
disciplinarity
machine learning
support vector model
dissertation abstracts
bibliometrics and scholarly communication
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a study of disciplinary stylistic differences among dissertation abstracts from physics, psychology, and philosophy. Based on differences in relative frequencies of metadiscourse terms as provided by Hyland (2005), we used a machine learning approach to construct SMO vector support models of each discipline whose average accuracy (88.3%) surpassed a baseline model by 22%. We found that model term weights supported the findings of previous qualitative research regarding differences between disciplines and by extension between hard sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Given the success of the metadiscourse-based model, we conclude by proposing an expanded study to investigate disciplinary style both across disciplines and over time.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
