Student Preference and Results after Comparing Screencast and Static Tutorials: A Usability Study
Mestre, Lori S.
Loading…
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/31245
Description
Title
Student Preference and Results after Comparing Screencast and Static Tutorials: A Usability Study
Author(s)
Mestre, Lori S.
Issue Date
2012-05
Keyword(s)
online learning
usability studies
tutorial assessment
UIUC,
Abstract
Tutorials can be “captivating” and if designed in a pedagogically sound way can provide valuable active learning experiences. However, the incorporation of multimedia takes extra time and expertise as far as learning the software, scripting, storyboarding, capturing, adding call outs, hotspots, captioning and recording. With demands on time at a premium it is important to evaluate whether the efforts result in the desired goals. Do students learn better with this type of platform/presentation of material or would they learn just as well, or better, with another? To test this, a usability study of two types of tutorials was conducted with 21 students representing diverse cultures and learning styles. Four hypotheses were tested to determine if tutorials made with screencasting software or those that that were static web pages with screenshots resulted in better comprehension for the task at hand.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.