Using low-stakes repeated testing can improve student learning: How (some) practice makes perfect
Grison, Sarah; Luke, Steven G.; Shigeto, Aya; Watson, Patrick D.K.
Loading…
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/28605
Description
Title
Using low-stakes repeated testing can improve student learning: How (some) practice makes perfect
Author(s)
Grison, Sarah
Luke, Steven G.
Shigeto, Aya
Watson, Patrick D.K.
Issue Date
2011-11
Keyword(s)
SoTL
Abstract
Two studies in Introductory Psychology classes explored whether repeated low-stakes testing can augment learning. In Experiment 1, answering more in-class questions with student response systems (SRSs) predicted better learning when students had not read the text. In Experiment 2, taking online practice quizzes predicted better learning, especially when questions on a concept were grouped. Repeated low-stakes testing can aid learning, but we must develop evidence-based pedagogical tools to maximize effects.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.