The role of language in the discovery and acceptance of vitamins
Maltz, Alesia
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/23714
Description
Title
The role of language in the discovery and acceptance of vitamins
Author(s)
Maltz, Alesia
Issue Date
1990
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Burkhardt, Richard W.
Department of Study
Language, Modern
Health Sciences, Nutrition
History of Science
Discipline
Language, Modern
Health Sciences, Nutrition
History of Science
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Language, Modern
Health Sciences, Nutrition
History of Science
Language
eng
Abstract
I contrast the language of biochemists and physicians, and describe how language obstructed acceptance of the deficiency theory and vitamin hypothesis in Great Britain at the beginning of this century.
The dissertation is divided into three sections. The first examines tension between proof and belief. I discuss: (a) why biochemists came to believe in the existence of vitamins, even though they had no chemical proof from the test tube; (b) why physicians would not discount the germ theory of beri-beri; and (c) the loss of face of biochemists who found themselves unable either to modify their methods or to find alternative ways to prove the existence of vitamins.
The second analyzes the controversy over rickets to demonstrate that the resolution of the controversy entailed a complete redefinition of the term. I describe: (a) one definition popular before the controversy; (b) the development of the controversy between the Cambridge and Glasgow Schools emphasizing how the social milieu inhibited the process of redefinition; and (c) changing conceptions of pathogenesis, treatment, diagnosis, etc.
"The third section explicitly discusses the function of language, its significance for the players, the disciplines and the controversy. Specifically, I describe: (a) Mellanby's issues about professional identity; (b) the ways in which choice of audience and professional influence affected the priority dispute between Funk and Hopkins over the ""discovery"" of vitamins; (c) the significance of the protracted discussion about the naming of vitamins; and (d) the dispute over negative causality and functional explanations."
These examples highlight the major issues of the dissertation, including the nature of discovery, of theory competition, and the disharmony inherent in disciplinary-based notions of what constituted an explanation.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
