The influence of group discussion on future member performance: Generality over tasks and persistence over time
Stasson, Mark Francis
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/23108
Description
Title
The influence of group discussion on future member performance: Generality over tasks and persistence over time
Author(s)
Stasson, Mark Francis
Issue Date
1989
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Davis, James H.
Department of Study
Psychology
Discipline
Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Psychology, Social
Language
eng
Abstract
Small, ad hoc groups perform a large number of organizational tasks, and discussion and consensus in these groups provides a setting for social influence. The study of this influence process is important because group members often perform similar such tasks later, either individually or in another group. Previous work has almost exclusively examined influence on the same task discussed by the group. This project investigated group influence on tasks similar to those performed by the group and persistence of influence over time in an attempt to gather support for or against the popular notion that participation in a group does affect future member performance. The study of influence across tasks and over time may also help distinguish between hypothesized group influence processes (e.g., informational, normative, commitment, etc.).
Five-person groups worked on an intellective task (arithmetic problem) and a judgmental task (choice between two risky prospects) under one of three assigned consensus requirements (simple majority, unanimity, or no specified rule). Actual group performance was summarized well by a truth wins process on the intellective task and a majority wins process on the judgmental task. Members of correct groups were more likely to be correct on posttest problems than those in a control condition (working individually) on the problem discussed in the group and an analogically similar problem (same structure, but different numerical values), but not on a problem structurally different from the group task. On judgmental tasks, subjects that experienced group opposition were more likely to change decision strategies on the group task and two similar tasks than both those with group support and subjects with no group experience. Assigned consensus rule affected only the intellective task, people in unanimous rule groups were more likely to be correct than those in majority rule groups. The same pattern of results was observed one week after the group performance tasks. This study provided a demonstration of group influence across tasks and over time, and supplied some insight into the processes underlying social influence.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
