University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

The effects of using software tools to study functions and their graphs

Frederick, Harold Richard

This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/22946

Description

Title
The effects of using software tools to study functions and their graphs
Author(s)
Frederick, Harold Richard
Issue Date
1989
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Travers, Kenneth J.
Department of Study
Education
Discipline
Education
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
  • Education, Mathematics
  • Education, Technology of
Language
eng
Abstract
  • The use of function plotter software for instruction holds great potential. Articles have been written that tell of the use of the software in the classroom and that sound very positive. But there is very little empirical evidence that shows the effect on achievement of using function plotters. The research reported in this study informs educators about the effect on achievement of plotting points by hand versus seeing them plotted by a computer.
  • One group (Plotter Group, n = 18) of volunteers from a beginning university algebra course completed graphing tasks using software that plotted on the computer monitor the graph of a function that the student entered into the computer. The other group (Table Group, n = 18) used software that give only the solution pairs for the graph of the function. These had to be plotted by the student in order to see the graph. In both cases, the student was relieved of doing the tedious calculations.
  • The students completed a set of tasks taking about 5 hours (over a 6 week period) involving functions and their graphs. The treatment did not have an overall effect on achievement measured by a post-test and by final exam items nor did it have a differential effect on post-treatment mathematics or computer attitudes. There was, however, an interaction between the treatment and both the graphing ability as measured by the pre-test and the computer experience of the subjects. The subjects with lower graphing ability received higher final exam scores if they used table software rather than plotter software. Those with higher pre-test scores did not differ in the two treatment groups.
  • Subjects who had not taken computer programming in high school scored significantly lower on the final exam if they were in the Plotter Group than the subjects in the Table Group. Mathematics ability and computer programming experience may have helped the subjects to cope with the plotter software which may have been seen as complex or too graphic.
  • It appears that when using new tools such as function plotters in education one needs to take into account the experiences and abilities of the learner. Such tools should be used discriminately to be most effective.
Type of Resource
text
Permalink
http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22946
Copyright and License Information
Copyright 1989 Frederick, Harold Richard

Owning Collections

Graduate Dissertations and Theses at Illinois PRIMARY
Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois
Dissertations and Theses - Education
Dissertations and Theses from the College of Education