Second language acquisition as the control of non-primary linguistic perception: A critique of research and theory
Judd, Joel Bennett
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/22165
Description
Title
Second language acquisition as the control of non-primary linguistic perception: A critique of research and theory
Author(s)
Judd, Joel Bennett
Issue Date
1992
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Cziko, Gary A.
Department of Study
Education
Discipline
Education
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Education, Language and Literature
Education, Educational Psychology
Language
eng
Abstract
The field of second language acquisition (SLA) has, in the last forty years, been one of the fastest growing branches of the social sciences. Today, aspects of non-primary language teaching and research are studied the world over. Advances in communications technology and geopolitical developments have served to increase public awareness of the importance and role of language in our lives.
Unfortunately, our understanding of the psychology of human language and behavior has not kept pace with these historical developments. As a result, the field of SLA has been employing research methods typical of the social sciences in general and psychology in particular, which methods are based on the statistical analysis of groups. While providing more and more data about the linguistic behavior of groups, they offer little understanding about how any one person learns another language. These methods are a result of psychology's emphasis on explaining behavior as a linear, predictable process.
In this thesis, it is argued that the main questions of interest in SLA are questions of individual language learning: How does one learn another language? How are different languages organized in the brain? Therefore, problems arise when methods of group statistical measurement are used to extrapolate to the individual. A review of studies used as evidence for key SLA hypotheses supports this claim. It is then argued that in order to determine an appropriate research methodology for SLA, a different theory of language and language learning is needed. For this purpose a current, general theory of human behavior as purposeful and goal-driven is offered as relevant to the field of SLA. With such a perspective, a more useful and accurate model of behavior and language is possible. Also, important changes in current conceptions of teaching are explored.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.