Case studies of instruction towards scientific literacy in three eighth-grade science classrooms in Illinois
Peters, Thomas T.
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/22145
Description
Title
Case studies of instruction towards scientific literacy in three eighth-grade science classrooms in Illinois
Author(s)
Peters, Thomas T.
Issue Date
1990
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Gould, Orrin
Department of Study
Education
Discipline
Education
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ed.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Education, Sciences
Language
eng
Abstract
Measures of scientific literacy point to inadequate programs of science education in American schools. Understanding current conditions in science classrooms is a necessary precursor to change. Yet, little information is available which describes what happens within them toward the goal of scientific literacy.
This study portrays current conditions in eighth grade science classrooms in three Illinois schools. These are--Wordsworth JHS in suburban Chicago, Plainfields School in rural, east-central Illinois, and Oswald JHS on the outskirts of a city in central Illinois.
An ethnographic approach is employed to develop profiles of the students, teachers, and science experiences. The Illinois State Learning Goals for Science serve as both the definition for scientific literacy in this study and as a framework to guide data collection. Data are presented from observations of lessons, interviews with students and teachers, surveys of students and teachers, and artifacts of classroom activities.
Towards the broad goals of scientific literacy mandated in Illinois, the study finds teachers emphasize a narrowly focused curriculum. They stress primarily content and vocabulary. There is little study of the social implications of technological development. Teachers and students value cooperation and communication as part of the science experience. Such experiences do occur, to some extent, in laboratory activities. Lab activities, however, emphasize direction following and finding right answers over developing process skills.
The author asserts that it is the structure of these schools as a series of isolating boxes that most influences science experiences within. School science is isolated from science outside of school and from other subjects within school. Teachers carry a box of assumptions about what is to be taught, how it is to be taught, and what is proof of successful teaching. Teaching is isolated from students' interests and learning. Students' role is as passive listener and paperworker. Motivation to learn comes from teacher generated rewards and punishments.
The author offers ten guiding questions toward breaking down structural boxes that hinder efforts toward scientific literacy.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.