Semiconductor electronic band alignment at heterojunctions of wurtzite aluminum nitride, gallium nitride, and indium nitride
Martin, Gregory Allen
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/21357
Description
Title
Semiconductor electronic band alignment at heterojunctions of wurtzite aluminum nitride, gallium nitride, and indium nitride
Author(s)
Martin, Gregory Allen
Issue Date
1996
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Wolfe, J.P.
Department of Study
Physics
Discipline
Physics
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Engineering, Electronics and Electrical
Physics, Condensed Matter
Engineering, Materials Science
Language
eng
Abstract
In this thesis the band alignments for wurtzite (0001) heterojunctions of AlN, GaN, and InN semiconductors are measured by x-ray photoemission spectroscopy. The bands alignments are all found to be Type I, and the valence-band discontinuities are found to be:(UNFORMATTED TABLE OR EQUATION FOLLOWS)$$\vbox{\halign{#\hfil&&\qquad #\hfil\cr &$\rm\Delta E\sb{v}$\ (eV)\cr\cr GaN on AlN &0.60 $\pm$ 0.24\cr AlN on GaN &0.57 $\pm$ 0.22\cr InN on GaN &0.93 $\pm$ 0.25\cr GaN on InN &0.59 $\pm$ 0.24\cr InN on AlN &1.71 $\pm$ 0.20\cr AlN on InN &1.32 $\pm$ 0.14\cr}}$$(TABLE/EQUATION ENDS)
"Forward-backward growth asymmetries are found for InN$\vert$GaN and InN$\vert$AlN, and highlight the importance of lattice mismatch and its influence on band alignment. The dielectric midgap energy is affected by lattice mismatch strain to a small degree, but in the opposite direction as observed in the experimental results. The strain-induced piezoelectric effect would provide effects of the correct sign, but an explicit overlayer thickness dependence is not observed: The model of pseudomorphic strain is rejected for InN$\vert$GaN and InN$\vert$AlN as expected for the exceedingly large lattice mismatches, but pseudomorphic strain is not ruled out for GaN$\vert$AlN. Thermal mismatch strain is rejected as a significant factor. In general there is insufficient knowledge of strain conditions at heterojunctions of AlN, GaN, and InN to provide quantitative strain corrections to the observed valence-band discontinuities. A bonding model assumes the lattice mismatch is accommodated by dislocations and dangling bonds at the interface. The dangling bonds are viewed as dipole corrections to the ideal lattice-mismatched heterojunction, and the dipole model accounts for the signs and trends of the observed forward-backward asymmetries but the model values are an order of magnitude too small. Using rough approximations for strain and dangling bond corrections the ""bulk"" valence-band discontinuities are estimated as GaN$\vert$AlN $\approx$ 0.7 eV, InN$\vert$GaN $\approx$ 0.76 eV, and InN$\vert$AlN $\approx$ 1.51 eV. These values satisfy transitivity to well within experimental and estimation uncertainties. Tabulations of x-ray photoemission values for core-level energies with respect to valence band edges for wurtzite AlN, GaN, and InN are presented."
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.