A social-cognitive approach to goal-setting: The mediating effects of achievement goals and perceived ability
Hall, Howard Kingsley
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/21288
Description
Title
A social-cognitive approach to goal-setting: The mediating effects of achievement goals and perceived ability
Author(s)
Hall, Howard Kingsley
Issue Date
1990
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Roberts, Glyn C.
Department of Study
Kinesiology and Community Health
Discipline
Kinesiology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Psychology, Social
Education, Physical
Language
eng
Abstract
"Current conceptual approaches to the study of achievement behavior (Ames, 1984; Dweck, 1986; Nicholls, 1984; Roberts, 1984) consider achievement goals and the perception of ability to be key mediating variables underlying achievement striving. Therefore, understanding how the same cognitive mediating variables impact on the effect of goal setting may offer an increased conceptual understanding of the goal setting-performance relationship. Specifically, the present investigation attempted to determine the effect of goal choice, perceived ability, goal structure and feedback upon the goal setting-performance relationship. One hundred and sixty nine male subjects were randomly assigned to one of 16 different conditions and were required to perform a balance task comprising nine, 30 second trials on a stability platform. After performing the first three trials under ""do-best"" instructions in order to obtain a baseline measure of performance, subjects were given fictitious feedback that they had performed well or poorly in order to manipulate their perceived ability. A goal of 60% improvement over the next six trials was then assigned to all subjects. They performed the next six trials under either an individualistic goal structure, where only personal performance feedback was given, or under a normative goal structure, where normative feedback indicating they had performed poorly compared to others was given in addition to personal performance feedback. Furthermore, fictitious performance feedback was administered following each trial indicating that the subject had either successfully achieved the 60% goal or that performance was discrepant from it. Upon completion of the baseline, and 2nd, 4th and 6th experimental trials, a number of questionnaires were administered to assess related cognitive information. Data analysis revealed significantly poorer performance over trials and a potentially debilitating pattern of performance cognitions for those having low perceived ability who performed under a normative goal structure. These results support the notion that achievement goals and perceived ability mediate the effects of assigned goals on performance, suggesting that a social cognitive motivational framework may facilitate an understanding of the goal setting-performance relationship."
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
