Spatial representation in drawing: The influence of size, viewpoint, and observation on drawing development
I, Bin
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/21136
Description
Title
Spatial representation in drawing: The influence of size, viewpoint, and observation on drawing development
Author(s)
I, Bin
Issue Date
1995
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Hardiman, George W.
Department of Study
Art Education
Discipline
Art Education
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ed.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Education, Art
Education, Educational Psychology
Language
eng
Abstract
Previous research (Willats, 1977a, b; Nicholls & Kennedy, 1992) concerning the final stage and route of drawing development in terms of projection systems remains controversial. In an attempt to clarify the complexity surrounding this topic, the present research investigated the underling cognitive dynamics related to drawing a solid, simple, and geometric object. Factors such as age, the viewpoint of the subject, and the size of object were carefully controlled. 874 subjects, ranging in age from 7 to 17 years, were randomly sampled from three public schools in Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. A 6 x 2 x 2 x 3 (age by view by size by task) experimental design was used. All the subjects were randomly assigned to four treatment conditions (big-front cube, small-front cube, big-corner cube, and small-corner cube) and participated in all three tasks, including drawing from memory (Task 1), drawing from observation (Task 2), and judgment task (Task 3). In the Task 2 and 3, a white cube was shown in each condition. 1748 drawings were classified into 28 categories based on the aspects of projection lines, foreshortening, number of facets, position of the bottom line, and proportion of facets. These categories were divided into five stages: orthographic projection, transition 1, transition 2, oblique projection, and perspective stages. The results indicated that primitive oblique (a square with oblique projection lines) was dominant when no cube was shown. The perspective could be the final stage of development when the cube was shown in its front view, especially when it was big enough. However, when the cube was shown in its corner view, the development ended with the more advanced oblique projection stage (all three facets obliquely projected) than in the Task 1. Therefore, the final stage of the development changes when drawing condition changes. The results are partially inconsistent with earlier studies. The routes of development are various. The development is a process of differentiation and refinement. It is oriented by both knowledge and perception. Whether the knowledge or the perception become dominant depends on the actual drawing situation. The results are also inconsistent with earlier studies.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
