The economics of violence: On the relations between power structures and economic systems
Brun, Michael Joram
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/20841
Description
Title
The economics of violence: On the relations between power structures and economic systems
Author(s)
Brun, Michael Joram
Issue Date
1992
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Ferber, Marianne A.
Department of Study
Economics
Discipline
Economics
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Anthropology, Cultural
Economics, General
Political Science, General
Sociology, Social Structure and Development
Language
eng
Abstract
This thesis examines force as a means of acquiring goods and services. Anthropological evidence indicates that resource scarcities and human wants do not suffice to dictate that economic activity be as intense as it appears in most modern societies. The use of force for exploiting the labor of others can lead to intensification of economic activity beyond what might be predicted from environmental conditions. Even more activity is needed to construct and maintain a social apparatus that regularizes the relations between producers and exploiters and also defends it from other exploiters. Tribute societies are discussed to explore the basic dynamics of violence. Slave societies are discussed with attention given to the supervisory, eventually bureaucratic middle layer between producers and exploiters arising with exploitative intervention in production. Gaining control over production rather than just over products gives exploiters essential competitive advantages. Capitalist societies are discussed to develop the intricacies of power and institutional structure. It is shown that power depends on a complex of trust, fear, and other forms of knowledge to maintain solidarity within groups and distinction between groups. The economic structure of enterprises, banks, etc. is not distinct from this power structure; rather the two structures are intertwined. Hence, like most others, economic institutions serve a number of purposes simultaneously, and in general do not optimize the attainment of any single purpose. For the same reason, attention to individual rationality can be shown to be insufficient--too reductionist--to explain macroeconomic phenomena. A sufficiently stable and understood political order is essential to the development of relevant macroeconomic theory and policy.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.