Developmental change in adolescents' psychological and legal competence to consent to abortion: An empirical study and quantitative model of social policy
Ambuel, Bruce Howard
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/20727
Description
Title
Developmental change in adolescents' psychological and legal competence to consent to abortion: An empirical study and quantitative model of social policy
Author(s)
Ambuel, Bruce Howard
Issue Date
1989
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Rappaport, Julian
Department of Study
Psychology
Discipline
Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Law
Women's Studies
Psychology, Developmental
Language
eng
Abstract
I present an empirical study of adolescents' competence to consent to abortion, and a mathematical model for comparing alternative social policies governing adolescent abortion. The empirical study examines the legal assumption that minors are not competent to consent to abortion, and assesses age and psychosocial variables as predictors of legal competence. Participants are 75 females, age 13 to 21, who suspect an unplanned pregnancy and come to a cooperating clinic for a pregnancy test. Volitional and cognitive facets of legal competence are assessed using a structured interview which is audio taped then analyzed by content analysis. One dimension of volitional competence is identified ($Volition$), and three dimensions of cognitive competence (thorough consideration of consequences, Consequences; number of reasons considered, Richness; and, quality of reasoning process, Global Quality). MANOVA is used to compare these 4 criteria of competence in a 3 by 2 design, with three age groups (13-15; 16-17; 18-21), and participants who consider abortion vs. participants who do not. Only 13-15 year old minors who do not consider abortion have lower scores than legal adults in Volition, Consequence, and Global Quality. In regression analysis with participants who consider abortion, age predicts all cognitive criteria, but not Volition. Social support, abortion knowledge, and other psychosocial variables predict all 4 criteria. When combined, age and psychosocial variables each make significant contributions to predicting cognitive competence. To examine policy implications of these empirical results, I developed a mathematical model which systematically compares the utility of alternative social policies across a universe of social values. Three policies are compared: (A) All minors are presumed incompetent; (B) All minors are presumed competent; and (C) Minors age 16 and 17 are presumed competent, and younger minors incompetent. Policies B and C perform well across a wide variety of values. Policy A performs poorly except under a narrow range of values. This method of analysis can be applied to other policy questions where divergent values are a significant component of debate. Results from both studies challenge the validity and utility of the common policy presumption that minors under age 18 are not competent to consent to abortion.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
