This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/20639
Description
Title
The elder Cato: A philological reassessment
Author(s)
Churchill, J. Bradford
Issue Date
1996
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Newman, John Kevin
Department of Study
Classics
Discipline
Classics
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Literature, Classical
History, Ancient
Political Science, General
Language
eng
Abstract
M. Porcius Cato (cos. 195 sc B.C.E.) has been a focal point of study of the literature and politics of Rome of the second century sc B.C.E. He has sometimes been seen as a study in contradictions--an enemy of Greek influence who partook of Greek influences, an enemy of luxury who indulged himself later in life, an enemy of money-lenders who was himself a money-lender, a man with rational convictions interwoven with irrational prejudices--and as a short-sighted, narrow, self-interested politician. By expanding upon recent historical studies of Cato and his role in the development of the Roman cultural self-image, a better integration of all the evidence will be proposed. Reflected in the preserved words and actions of Cato is a creative, thoughtful, practical, and ideologically balanced approach to rhetoric, politics, and social mores. He judged things Greek on the basis of their compatibility with Roman standards, and is not attested as having characterized anything as worthless merely because it was foreign. He claimed to be no enemy of harmless indulgence, but indulgence which led to corruption he fought to control. He advocated regulation of interest rates, not the abolition of lending at interest, and himself engaged in maritime loans, which were transactions of a different sort. His rational positions were argued with emotional conviction, but betray no indication of reactionary prejudice. His political acts are not obviously calculated primarily in self-interest, but he recognized areas of individual conduct which were detrimental to the stability and viability of the Roman state, and attacked them in court as he did in the legislative arena. It is no surprise that among later Romans he became an exemplar of virtue for his consistent adherence to his stated principles.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
