The effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension
Schommer, Marlene Ann
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/20126
Description
Title
The effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension
Author(s)
Schommer, Marlene Ann
Issue Date
1989
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
West, Charles K.
Department of Study
Education
Discipline
Education
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Education, Educational Psychology
Education, Reading
Psychology, Developmental
Language
eng
Abstract
In the last two decades educators and researchers have evolved the idea that beliefs about the nature of knowledge, or epistemological beliefs, may provide a partial explanation for why some students fail to integrate knowledge (Anderson & Pearson, 1984b), have inflexible criteria for comprehension monitoring (Yussen, 1985), or oversimplify information (Spiro, Vispoel, Schmitz, Samarapungavan, & Boerger, 1987). The purpose of this research was to these ideas.
"The overall question to be addressed by this research is ""Do students' epistemological beliefs affect their comprehension?"" A questionnaire designed to identify epistemological beliefs was administered to 266 undergraduates. Verbal ability, prior knowledge and demographic characteristics were also assessed. Then, a group of these students ($N$ = 86) read a passage on a topic in either psychology or nutrition. Next, students were asked to imagine that they were the author of the passage and to write a concluding paragraph. Then, they assessed their understanding of the passage. Finally, a multiple choice test was administered to test specific passage information."
Factor analysis of the questionnaire resulted in four factors named as follows: (I) The Ability to Learn is Innate, (II) Knowledge is Discrete and Unambiguous, (III) Learning is Quick or Not-At-All, and (IV) Knowledge is Certain. Written conclusions were coded for adequate reflection of complexity and uncertainty. The effect of epistemological beliefs on the nature of conclusions drawn was tested by first regressing comprehension measures on verbal ability, prior knowledge, and sex; and then, allowing epistemological factors to compete for entry.
Epistemological factors predicted interpretation, comprehension, and comprehension assessment. The more students believe Learning is Quick or Not-At-All, the more likely they are to write oversimplified conclusions. The more students believe Knowledge is Certain, the more likely they will interpret inconclusive information as certain. The more students believe Learning is Quick or Not-At-All, the more likely they are to perform poorly on typical comprehension measures and inaccurately assess their comprehension.
These results suggest that students' epistemological beliefs can be described as a complex system that affects comprehension. These effects are generalizable across two domains and are evidenced beyond the effects of factors traditionally known to influence comprehension.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
