Compatibility in the visual field and the use of nontraditional flight displays
Weinstein, Lisa F.
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/19537
Description
Title
Compatibility in the visual field and the use of nontraditional flight displays
Author(s)
Weinstein, Lisa F.
Issue Date
1990
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Wickens, Christopher D.
Department of Study
Psychology
Discipline
Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Engineering, Aerospace
Psychology, Experimental
Language
eng
Abstract
Two visual-spatial tasks were time-shared in an experiment to investigate the possibility of a compatibility mapping between the type of task (object-identification or motion-judgment) and the presentation location of the task in the visual field (central or peripheral). The attentional costs associated with time-sharing visual-spatial tasks were also addressed. The use of non-traditional flight displays to reduce visual overload in the cockpit was also explored. Three flight displays (central, peripheral, flow-field) were employed between subjects and the task types and locations were manipulated within groups. The results showed that (1) the type of task determined how quickly it was performed, while the location determines how accurately it was performed; (2) two peripheral tasks were found to interfere more than one central and one peripheral task, or two central tasks; (3) the flow-field display allowed for the most efficient time-sharing, suggesting further investigation into the use of non-traditional flight displays for the reduction of central visual overload in the cockpit. These results suggest that regardless of the task type, peripheral tasks are more demanding than central tasks. While limited evidence was found to support the compatibility hypothesis, no evidence was found to support the hypothesis that central and peripheral vision constitute separate resources.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.