Effects of integrating cognitive apprenticeship instructional methods into the community college writing classroom
Duncan, Sarah L. Smith
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/19398
Description
Title
Effects of integrating cognitive apprenticeship instructional methods into the community college writing classroom
Author(s)
Duncan, Sarah L. Smith
Issue Date
1996
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Johnson, Scott D.
Department of Study
Education
Discipline
Education
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Education, Community College
Education, Language and Literature
Education, Curriculum and Instruction
Language
eng
Abstract
This study examined the effects of integrating cognitive apprenticeship instructional methods into community college writing instruction--a problem solving approach (see Flower, 1993; Flower & Hayes, 1980) using think aloud modeling (Collins, Brown, & Holum, 1991; Schoenfeld, 1985). Nine intact classes were randomly assigned to treatments and control groups; data included ACT's Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency Writing Skills Test (1993), essay scores, instructor journals, classroom observations, and instructor interviews. MANCOVA indicated that cognitive apprenticeship is effective in writing instruction. Treatment students' post test means were higher at a statistically significant level than the controls'. Subsequent univariate ANOVAs found statistically significant differences in CAAP post-test means. Univariate ANCOVA revealed statistically significant differences among treatment groups. ANOVAs found significance between groups. No significance was found for essays. Modeling instructors reported (a) increased student attention and enthusiasm, (b) that they would continue to perform think aloud modeling during instruction, and that they felt new modeling instructors will need intensive and on-going training, coaching, and feedback.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.