Standards, assumptions, and perceptions regarding division of labor: Implications for marital satisfaction and socio-political change
Horneffer, Karen Jean
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/19383
Description
Title
Standards, assumptions, and perceptions regarding division of labor: Implications for marital satisfaction and socio-political change
Author(s)
Horneffer, Karen Jean
Issue Date
1996
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Fincham, Frank D.
Department of Study
Psychology
Discipline
Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Psychology, Behavioral
Psychology, Social
Women's Studies
Sociology, Individual and Family Studies
Language
eng
Abstract
Recent social and political trends have resulted in cultural ambiguity regarding marital roles, specifically pertaining to how labor should be divided with regard to household chores and child rearing. The importance of cognitive processes regarding labor division has been suggested by several lines of research, although few efforts have been made to integrate this work with the broader literatures on marital cognition and social comparison theory. The current project bridges these areas of study by considering the relationships among cognitions regarding the division of labor in actual, typical, and ideal marriages. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from eighty-three dual-earner couples in order to pursue four goals: (1) compare perceptions of egalitarianism in actual, typical, and ideal marriages; (2) test proposed relationships among cognitive contents and marital satisfaction; (3) understand cognitive comparison processes; and (4) examine narrative descriptions of ideal and actual marriages. Findings from the study indicate that ideal marriages were perceived as most egalitarian, and spouses tended to view their actual marriages as being similar to the ideal and better than the typical marriage. As hypothesized, more favorable social comparisons were associated with higher levels of marital satisfaction, and cognitions regarding the typical and ideal marriage played distinct roles relative to social comparison processes. The results of the study highlight the importance of specifying a referent when considering marital cognitions, as well as recognizing gender differences in the salience of different cognitive contents. Two cognitive phenomena are theorized to result from current ambiguity regarding division of labor arrangements: a rejection of external marital ideals in favor of relying on one's own experience, and the utilization of downward social comparisons to the typical marriage. The implications of these findings with regard to marital satisfaction and socio-political change are discussed.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
