University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Pragmatic referring functions as Montague semantic operators

Helmreich, Stephen Christian

This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/19314

Description

Title
Pragmatic referring functions as Montague semantic operators
Author(s)
Helmreich, Stephen Christian
Issue Date
1996
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Green, Georgia M.
Department of Study
Linguistics
Discipline
Linguistics
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Language, Linguistics
Language
eng
Abstract
  • In this dissertation, the thesis is defended that lexical semantics is not a subdomain of semantics, but rather a subdomain of pragmatics. That is, knowledge about the meaning of words is not part of one's knowledge of the language, but rather part of one's knowledge of the world. This distinction marks the traditional difference between dictionary and encyclopedia. One consults a dictionary to find out what the word lemon means (on the assumption that one knows what lemons are), while one goes to the encyclopedia to find out about lemons (on the assumption that you know how English speakers name them). The view suggested here is that this is a distinction that is not possible to maintain in a formal description of a language. Such a formal description, it is claimed, should contain only minimal semantic information about any lexical item. Almost all semantic information would be regarded as encyclopedic world-knowledge.
  • Part of establishing this thesis is to show that the interpretation of lexical items in utterances can be contextually determined, given a suitably broad definition of context, and is thus pragmatic in nature, understanding the domain of pragmatics to be language in context. It is shown that is is possible both for interpretation of an utterance to depend on the interpretation of its parts (to accept some form of the Principle of Compositionality) and for the interpretation of the smallest parts to be determined pragmatically from context.
  • Thus much of this dissertation is devoted to the task of providing a truth-conditional model-theoretic account of utterance meaning that allows for the interpretation of lexical items in context without recourse to any object that might be called its meaning. This account uses a Montague-type semantics and incorporates a modification of the methods suggested in Nunberg (1978).
Type of Resource
text
Permalink
http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19314
Copyright and License Information
Copyright 1996 Helmreich, Stephen Christian

Owning Collections

Graduate Dissertations and Theses at Illinois PRIMARY
Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois
Dissertations and Theses - Linguistics